GM Science Review - home page link/graphic
 

GM Science Review - Forum

Name: Malcolm Edmunds Location: Lancashire Date: 01/07/03

Topic 1: GM food and feed safety

Topic 2: Topic 3:
Topic 4: Topic 5:  
Title:
The need for more rigorous testing of GM foods
Full comment:

There are four reasons why I believe much more rigorous testing than has so far been carried out is required to ensure that GM foods really are safe:

1. Genes may have different effects in different gene complexes. A classic example is the Hox genes some of which have very different effects in different phyla of animals, plants and micro-organisms. Therefore more stringent testing is required to check against unintended harmful effects where the genes being transferred come from very different organisms than when they come from closely related species.

2. Genes are often pleiotropic (i.e. have many different effects), so a gene may have an effect other than the intended one. It is therefore essential that every GMO is thoroughly tested for any harmful unintended effects. Such testing needs to be far more rigorous than that of cultivars produced through traditional breeding techniques, particularly where the introduced gene comes from a very different type of organism.

3. Early GMOs used antibiotic resistance genes as markers for the gene that was being transferred. Such genes can occasionally be picked up by micro-organisms. We are currently suffering from far too profligate use of antibiotics in people and farm animals such that a great many pathogens now exhibit multiple drug resistance. The use of antibiotic resistance genes as markers in GMOs should be banned. Further, careful scrutiny of any other marker genes is very important for the reasons given in (1) and (2) above.

4. The precautionary principle should apply: unless a particular GMO is seen to have substantial 'benefits', then it should not be authorised for release, even if it appears to have no harmful medical or health effects. By 'benefits' I mean benefit not just to the manufacturer and the farmer, but also to the consumer and the environment, and it should also have no harmful effects on neighbouring landowners (who may, for example, be trying to farm organically).

Malcolm Edmunds, Professor of Zoology
Department of Environmental Science
University of Central Lancashire

To go back to the previous page: use the "Back" button on your browser, or click here for the index

   
Help/Terms & conditions Page published 4 July 2003; last modified 30 September, 2003