|
Greenpeace is aware of other submissions, specifically those
of Genewatch, outlining a number of key issues that need to
be addressed. We agree that these are key issues and would
like to put forward the following observations as additional
comments on each of the areas.
Overall comment
The most obvious overall consideration that is absent from
the 5 topic areas is a review of the precision of the scientific
basis of genetic modification and our understanding of the
process of genetic expression and control. There are numerous
statements by scientists about the imprecision of genetic
manipulation and the consequent difficulty in tying down unintended
or pleiotropic effects, particularly in the areas of, for
example, post transcriptional control of gene expression,
the role of non-coding RNAs. This is, at least at a technical
level, one of the key uncertainties that gives a legitimate
basis to public concern over uncertain and unforeseen risks.
What is missing is the linkage between the inevitable uncertainties
that this introduces and the impact for policy frameworks.
Such a review would impact on the environmental harm, food
safety, future developments and regulatory process areas.
One review of this was done by Plant Breeding International:
de Visser, E.H. Nijhuis, J.D. van Elsas and T.A. Dueck
Crops of Uncertain Nature?: Controversies and Knowledge Gaps
Concerning Genetically Modified Crops: An Inventory, 1999.
Wageningen, Netherlands
We are unaware of any others.
A further element of such a review would be that of unpredictable
behaviour observed in existing crop usage or new molecular
data on the GM event that only comes to light after approvals
have been given. To our knowledge virtually none of this exists
in the peer-reviewed literature but to suggest this is not
considered would be absurd. Britain has experienced heavy
flooding in early January 2003 but this has not found its
way into the peer-reviewed literature; limiting a review to
only peer-reviewed journal articles would imply that 'scientifically'
such flooding never happened.
Dr. Douglas Parr
Chief Scientific Adviser
Greenpeace UK
www.greenpeace.org.uk
|